How's that 'local control' workin' for ya? 

PUBLIC SCHOOLS enjoy unique status in American society. Perhaps no other institution is so widely recognized as needing drastic reform, yet so fiercely resists the slightest change.

Chalk it up to bureaucracy, teachers unions, effective propaganda, parents' unwillingness to tamper with anything involving their kids, or a combination of all those. In any case, change comes to our public schools at a pace glaciers would impatiently regard as agonizingly slow.

A reform effort is underway at the state level, specifically a referendum on the ballot this year about charter schools. A "Yes" vote on Amendment One would allow the creation of a state-level commission that charter school applicants could appeal to in case they're refused initial charter approval by their local school board.

(It would actually be a restoration, since a 2011 court ruling did away with the previous state charter school commission.)

The politics are raw. Charter school backers see the public school bureaucracy as counterproductive and obsessed with bean-counting over education. Standard public school backers view charter schools as elitist upstarts who want public funding without full public accountability.

The situation's made more volatile by the fact that charter schools' only real leverage right now is their higher student performance, which of course only inflames existing resentment and turf jealousy.

Sometimes things work out, as they did recently when the new Savannah Classical Academy was approved by the Savannah/Chatham County School Board (congratulations, Roger Moss!)

Sometimes they don't, as when the school board insisted that Oglethorpe Charter School's much-needed new building be significantly bigger than what the school actually needs -- then insisted that Oglethorpe change its successful teaching model to conform to the new building!

In any case, it's not a fair fight. State Attorney General Sam Olens recently had to step in and tell school boards around the state, including ours, to stop diverting taxpayer money and resources to campaign against Amendment One.

The disinformation flies fast and thick, including charges that charter schools pick and choose only the best students (certainly not the case locally), that they cost more than regular schools (per-pupil cost is usually less with charter schools), and that they are Trojan Horses for privatization (certainly not the case locally).

Largely skirting any discussion of how best to educate children, opponents of Amendment One rely on a time-tested slogan: "Keep Local Control." As in, let local school boards continue to have final say over the creation of new charter schools.

My only question for those who insist on "keeping local control" is this:

How's that workin' out for ya?

Amendment One is far from a perfect solution. But what amazes me is how its opponents point out its imperfections in meticulous detail (see this letter for an example) while pretending that everyone is happy with the status quo.

But that's the power of inertia. The public school system is a big ship that's very slow to turn, with charter schools -- despite their alleged all-powerful evil agenda -- still a little canoe capsizing in its wake.

So if you're hesitant to vote Yes on Amendment One, ask yourself again: How's that "local control" workin' out for ya?



About The Author

Jim Morekis

Jim Morekis

A native Savannahian, Jim has been editor-in-chief of Connect Savannah for 15 years. The University of Georgia graduate is also a travel writer, authoring regional guides in the Moon handbook series... more


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Connect Today 10.15.2018

Latest in Editor's Note

  • Editor's Note: Time for a full school audit

    The borrowing of the $21 million just to make payroll is through an instrument called a Tax Anticipation Note (TAN). A TAN is not unusual in the world of bureaucratic funding. But while a TAN is often routine, this particular TAN was anything but.
    • Oct 10, 2018
  • Editor's Note: What's important to you?
  • Editor's Note: What's important to you?

    The City's survey on what to do with the Civic Center is in some ways an example of their mode of cart-before-the-horse thinking. The issue of the Civic Center's future should have been settled long before the plans for the new Arena were this far along.
    • Oct 3, 2018
  • Editor's Note: Oops! Arena may <i>not</i> have been approved by voters twice
  • Editor's Note: Oops! Arena may not have been approved by voters twice

    A look at the actual ballot language from 2006 and 2013 contains a few interesting things folks may have forgotten about.
    • Sep 26, 2018
  • More »

The Most: Read | Shared | Comments

Right Now On: Twitter | Facebook

Copyright © 2018, Connect Savannah. All Rights Reserved.
Website powered by Foundation