Vision needed, not delusions 

AT A TIME when the future of Georgia requires clear thinking and insightful action more than ever, a few key leaders are presenting the state’s citizens with some of the most delusional ideas in our state’s history.

Two of the most troubling symptoms of this wrongheadedness are, first, the most recent mutation of the state water planning recommendations and, secondly, the ill-conceived proposal to shift the burden of supporting the state budget from property tax to sales tax.

The politically-driven State Water Council has recommnded that water planning districts should be described by the political boundaries of state “service delivery areas” a device for allegedly promoting orderly (and profitable) development – as if Georgia’s water resources were nothing more than a commodity for serving economic motives.

This is like a farmer deciding where to plant his most important cash crops on the basis of access to the highway that leads to his market, rather than an informed study of his land’s soil fertility, crop rotation, water availability, wind exposure, and slope.

River systems, like successful farms, are governed by the laws of nature, not man, and both are ruined by willful disregard of natural processes. The effectivenss of their management is determined by scientific understanding of what maintains the healthy balance of a complex community of ecosystem elements, from microbes to major plants and animals.

To “manage” water as if drainage areas are less important than political boundaries is to profoundly contradict common sense, and undoubtedly will result in environmental decline as well as fiscal malfeasance.

Some may wonder about the assertion of fiscal consequences. Damage caused by major blunders costs much more to repair than minor errors, and nothing is more mistaken than deciding to make water management decisions on the basis of politcal will and power.

Harm to our rivers and aquifers caused by an engineered approach to natural resource management will surely be monumental. Thus, the Water Council’s recommendations are irresponsible both environmentally and fiscally.

Compounding the unproductive bias in planning districts, under the Water Council’s recommendations appointment to regional water planning councils would become completely political, and not based on balanced representation of all stakeholder groups. The governor, lieutenant governor, and General Assembly leaders from each chamber would determine who serves. Party loyalists and major donors would then be determining how our state waters are to be used.

Decisions based on the political needs of politically favored appointees will inevitably lead to unfairness in the allocation of water, a public resource owned by all citizens, to support the profit-making goals of the few at the expense of the many. As long as public interest is held to be served above all by maximizing economic growth, Georgians can be assured that their natural resources will be exploited to the detriment of future generations and to the least favored politically.

Which leads to the second symptom in this diagnosis of political self-delusion. Whatever the serious drawbacks of shifting from property tax to sales tax as the primary means of generating state revenues, one thing is certain: politicians promoting the switch are saying that it will help Georgia grow faster. Say what?!

Does any rational, informed citizen really think Georgia isn’t already growing fast enough? One doesn’t need to be an economist to understand that, for many reasons and by various measures, moderate growth is far better in the long run than rampant expansion.

Indeed, it can be demonstrated that many of Georgia’s most challenging problems, including water management, are being aggravated, if not caused, by excessive growth – at least in some dominant areas of the state, most notably metro Atlanta.

It’s time to get honest and incisive in making decisions having such far-reaching implications. This means recognizing that Georgia’s growth must be moderated and managed, not promoted.

Further, it underscores the imperative that anyone who puts politics over the laws of nature in managing water does not deserve public office.

David Kyler is executive director of the Center for a Sustainable Coast, on Saint Simons Island, Georgia. The Center for a Sustainable Coast is a membership-supported non-profit organization serving the interests of coastal Georgians. For more information about the Center, visit www.sustainablecoast.org.

To comment, e-mail us at letters@connectsavannah.com


About The Author

David C. Kyler


Showing 1-1 of 1


Comments are closed.

Connect Today 10.21.2018

Latest in Free Speech

  • Recess and unstructured break time: Is there a difference?

    State law mandates that districts have a policy on unstructured break.
    • Oct 10, 2018
  • School board should respect free speech rights of constituents

    Generally on these hot-button issues ten to twelve members of the public have shown up to speak, adding no more than an average additional hour to the monthly public meeting. Our School Board Members asked for their jobs, they raised money to campaign for their jobs, they went door-to-door and asked for you to trust them with your vote. And now they want to vote to eliminate public comments and censor their constituents at publicly held School Board meetings. Before they vote on policies that affect our community.
    • Aug 22, 2018
  • Homeless camps are a symptom, not the disease

    The settlements are there because they provide significant social relationships where none exist otherwise
    • Aug 15, 2018
  • More »

The Most: Read | Shared | Comments

Right Now On: Twitter | Facebook

Copyright © 2018, Connect Savannah. All Rights Reserved.
Website powered by Foundation