SAVANNAH Congressman Earl “Buddy” Carter ran unopposed for reelection in 2016. Democrats in Georgia’s First District didn’t even field a candidate.

But the game has changed. Now, with President Trump at record disapproval ratings and Congressional town halls turning into raucous displays of dissatisfaction, the way would seem open for Carter to face serious opposition.

Several hats are being tossed into the ring as we speak for the chance to gain the Democratic nomination and face Carter in November 2018. Connect will endeavor to speak to all of them, and this week we speak to Steve Jarvis.

During a time when many Democrats are saying the Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren approach of more overtly leftist economic populism is the way forward, Savannah native Jarvis is taking a nearly opposite approach.

Claiming a return to the First District’s old persona as the home of conservative Democrats like Bo Ginn and Lindsay Thomas, Jarvis’s approach seems downright nostalgic in this era when conservative Democrats, especially in the South, are a nearly extinct species.

Jarvis thinks his extensive military record as a U.S. Army combat infantry veteran of the Iraq War will help him gain traction in a district which has a heavy military presence.

Why are you running at this particular time, rather than last election cycle?

It wasn’t time then. I was just getting out of the military and trying to find a new career path. Now, I’m settled. I’m happily married with three children and one more on the way.

Now, as a veteran I don’t appreciate the way veterans are being used as pawns. My parents are in their upper 70s. To me veterans and the elderly are used as pawns by politicians, and the day after the election everything’s forgotten.

I want to get into the race to be the voice of the people of this district. I don’t want to be the voice of big pharmaceutical companies, or of big government. I want to be the voice of the people, and of the veterans and the elderly. I don’t believe our current congressman is any of those.

The current mood in the country, and especially among liberals, seems quite angry. What makes your temperament a fit for this particular national mood?

I’m a warrior and I win. Right now our current congressman isn’t a warrior at all. There is a disconnect between him and the people who voted for him. I think he listens more to lobbyists that benefit him.

My temperament is I listen. I pay attention. I care. People aren’t listening to the elderly or to veterans.

I know somebody who’s been fighting the VA on one claim for 20 years. That’s unacceptable.

If the current congressman isn’t going to hold the VA accountable, why is he there? If he’s not going to be the voice of the elderly, why is he there?

Where do you stand on the current debate over the future of the Affordable Care Act?

President Trump said for seven years Republicans have been wanting to repeal and replace, but that was easy to say when they knew they had a president that wouldn’t sign it.

Now they have a president in office waiting with pen in hand. Why hasn’t anything been done? Because it doesn’t benefit them.

But what would you like to see? Obamacare kept, fixed, done away with?

I would like to see a health care program where the buyer has more say. Health care is broken and it needs to be fixed. It needs to be affordable and accessible. Right now it’s not either. People should be able to have a policy that works for them. But frankly this is probably going to be taken care of before I take office.

There’s a growing mood on the left wing of the Democratic Party that the only real way forward is single-payer, nationalized health care.

I don’t think single-payer is the path we need to go on. It will give the government too much more power. I don’t believe health care is a government issue, and I don’t believe it should be a national government issue.

Some say health care is a right, others say it’s not. But to make it a government issue is outside the realm of what Congress is supposed to be doing.

In the Trump era, immigration is a highly polarized issue. You are running for the nomination of a party which is opposed to Trump’s proposed border wall. Where do you personally stand?

I’m pro-legal immigration. There needs to be legal pathways to immigration. We’re a nation of laws and we’re a sovereign nation. I served six years protecting that. We pride ourselves on the fact that people want to come here and live. If that’s the case, they need to come here the legal way.

You can’t round people up who are here illegally. You need a path to citizenship available for them. They don’t go to the front of the line, but there has to be a path. But for illegal immigrants here who are committing crimes, there should be no path at all.

In a Democratic primary, you are inevitably going to get questions about where you stand on issues of use of excessive use of force by police, and associated issues like racial profiling and stop-and-frisk.

That’s a local issue. That is police department policy. When we see these things on Facebook and TV, we’re getting a small picture of the entire issue. If a police officer uses force beyond what is called for under their policy, absolutely that police officer should be tried. It’s up to the jury at that point. As a former parole officer, I know there are times use of force is necessary. We have almost gotten to the point where the police are considered criminals.

Should you be elected, and should Democrats take over the House in 2018, impeachment proceedings will almost certainly be proposed. Where do you stand on the issue of the impeachment of President Trump?

What high crime or misdemeanor did he commit? If there’s no crime there’s no impeachment. That goes to the partisan politics and game playing that got us where we are now.

What do you think of the current allegations that he colluded with Russia?

I know of none. Where’s the proof? Where’s the crime? If there’s no proof even with the independent counsel, why are we doing this? Congress needs to be moving America forward.

cs

10 replies on “Steve Jarvis joins Democrats vying for chance to face Buddy Carter”

  1. Why is this guy running as a Democrat? All of his positions sound identical to Representative Carter’s. Is is because he can’t get any support from the Republican party to primary against the incumbent? It seems he wants to spoil the chances of truly progressive candidates who will represent the interests of the constituents. I would really love to hear from Democrats who support him, because I truly can’t believe there are any.

  2. I sure hope we can do better than this guy. All he would need to do is threaten a Senator and then he would be Buddy Carter.

  3. I am a pretty active Dem, albeit in Glynn County but with lots of Savannah friends. As of this afternoon no one I know has ever heard of the candidate. I thank him for his service but perhaps he should start out running for a less ambitious and sensitive office. I have to add that we have had some recent and unfortunate experience with Trojan horses.

  4. Many democrats wish to evaluate and compare all the candidates before choosing one to actively support.
    I had an open mind when this one appeared on the scene but was startled by two things.

    First, there are indications that he *may* have run as a Republican in previous elections. (Could _Connect_ please look into this?) that would certainly explain why he sounds like a Repubican but does make one wonder why he wouldn’t simply run as one this time.

    Second, he has been taking potshots at actual Democrats on his Facebook page, making snarky and inaccurate comments about them, which they cannot contest because he blocks them for committing the crime of having been born in another state (like half of the district) or for making mild philosophical statements or questions about his platform. None of this is necessary; a good politician would be respectful and diplomatic, humble and persuasive. He is the one applying for a job, after all.

    He claims to be a good listener, to value civility, and to be inclusive, but is already alienating his potential base.

  5. Steve Jarvis (aka B. Stefan Jarvis, look it up) tried to run for office as a Republican in 2013 and 2016, a fact that he has denied vehemently on his Facebook page, despite the fact that some light research shows this to be true.

    More importantly, his behavior in insulting and demeaning folks on his Facebook page – and then subsequently deleting those posts – who were merely asking legitimate questions about his positions on vital issues like healthcare, is deeply concerning. His paper thin skin reeks of Trump, as do his blatant lies. This man is in no way fit to represent us, which he has proven in just a few short days after announcing his candidacy.

  6. His comments don’t sound like he is a Democrat. My red flags went up when I heard him claim to be a “Conservative” Democrat. He sounds like a wolf in sheep’s clothing. I’ll be voting for Lisa Ring in November 2018. We need to get Buddy Carter out and have someone in Congress who listens to HER constituents.

  7. This candidate answered with brutal honesty when asked about his position on whether we have a right to health care. From his campaign, “As far as what you are entitled to, absolutely nothing.”

    This guy is definitely not a Democrat, and his rude responses to those asking questions about his platform indicate that he is not fit to be elected to office, no matter his political leanings.

  8. So the guy does not want criminal illegals here, doesn’t believe health care is where it needs to be and is supportive of local law enforcement. According to numerous posts, he is not a democrat.
    Just how would a democrat respond to similar questions?
    No borders, welcome all.
    Free healthcare for everyone.
    Chastise all law enforcement for a few bad apples.

Comments are closed.