THE PROPOSED $40 million Starland Village mixed-use development project has caused much controversy in Savannah’s rapidly changing Victorian district.
Opponents say the project — comprising a multi-story, modern residential building, an event space in a historic church, and a large parking garage — is simply too voluminous and out of character for the historic neighborhood.
Starland Village recently passed another hurdle on Aug. 28 at the Metropolitan Planning Commission, when its development plan was approved.
At that meeting, City Manager Rob Hernandez personally took over authorization of Starland Village’s Certificate of Appropriateness, using a clause in the Mid-City zoning ordinance allowing him to serve as sole “Design Administrator.”
But Connect Savannah has obtained emails that are part of the public record which show that the City’s efforts to push through the project go back much further.
The emails display what some might see as an overly cozy relationship between City officials and The Foram Group, the company developing Starland Village.
At minimum they are a window into the interconnected and complex nature of the way development sometimes happens in Savannah.
Highlights include:
• The Foram Group identifying an active police precinct on Bull Street as needed for the development, then working with City officials to declare the property surplus in order for Foram to purchase it;
• A Request For Proposal (RFP) process for buying that surplus property that one could argue seemed specifically designed to benefit The Foram Group;
• Foram’s apparent involvement in public policy-making with regards to 1) relocating a working police precinct, 2) creating a brand-new zoning category, and 3) changing Chatham Area Transit routes.
Major players include:
• Travis Stringer, President of The Foram Group
• Rob Hernandez, Savannah City Manager
• Liz Taschereau, City of Savannah Strategic Initiatives Manager, who worked previously with Hernandez in South Florida and who was hired concurrently with Hernandez to come to Savannah
• Robert McCorkle, attorney hired by The Foram Group to represent the project
• Sean Brandon, City of Savannah Director of Mobility and Parking Services
• City Attorney Brooks Stillwell
• Mayor Eddie DeLoach
The Emails
The saga begins with a breakfast meeting in January 2017 between Foram’s Travis Stringer, Rob Hernandez, Liz Taschereau, and Mayor DeLoach to discuss the Starland Village proposal.
In a January 28, 2017 email, Stringer follows up with DeLoach:
“I think the meeting went really well and this project will be a great catalyst for the redevelopment of the Bull Street corridor and ultimately help towards accomplishing many of your goals for Savannah.”
THE ISSUE of the police precinct on Bull Street comes up almost immediately.
In a Jan. 2017 email, Stringer writes to Liz Taschereau and DeLoach:
“I am very glad to hear you guys drove by and like the property and concept… we are working on getting the one pager and proposal for the city property on the corner of 38th and Bull (police traffic unit) to you.”
In a Feb. 8, 2017, email, Stringer writes Taschereau:
“We are nearing a proposal for the city property where the traffic precinct is located on Bull and 39th and are in the process of identifying alternative locations for the precinct. I think it would be good to have a conversation with the police chief to get a better understanding of where they would like to be.”
In a particularly interesting email on Feb. 17, 2017, Stringer writes Taschereau, confirming that the breakfast meeting included a discussion of the City declaring the precinct as surplus, with Foram as the intended buyer.
He also seems to insinuate that the City shouldn’t follow regular legal protocol:
“I am reaching out in regards to the city property on the corner of 38th and Bull st. Last we met with Rob, it was mentioned at breakfast that we should send out a proposal to you for the city property. We are nearing a finished product to send you. Before doing so, I would like to get a better understanding of exactly the quickest and best process to go about this. We would prefer not to go through an RFP process as that is time consuming. [emphasis ours] In addition, we are working on identifying some properties on the westside (MLK corridor) but need a better idea of what the police chief/city manager would be interested in. Is this necessary in order to go forward with the city property on Bull?”
MEANWHILE, on March 6, 2017, Melody Dawkins of The Foram Group invites Alderman Bill Durrence, in whose 2nd District Starland Village would go, to meet and contribute input:
“We are working on a project that’s (sic) goal is to help facilitate the growth of the creatives and innovators in Savannah. We want to collaborate as much as possible with the community and like-minded individuals with similar visions. I would love to get together when you have time to learn about your thoughts on Thomas Square-Starland community and your vision for the neighborhood.”
The meeting happens, and on March 13, 2017, Dawkins writes Alderman Durrence:
“Thank you for meeting with us last week and sharing your input! Would you be interested in coming by next week? We can fill you in on details of the project and show you pretty pictures from the architect.”
ON March 14, 2017, The Foram Group creates an account with the City so that they can be eligible to respond to City Surplus Property RFPs.
On March 27, 2017, Taschereau writes Stringer:
“Just following up on the status of your project as we are moving forward with the surplus property transaction.”
The same day, Stringer responds to Taschereau:
“I have been keeping an eye out everyday for the RFP on the city property. There have been some minor improvements since we last spoke that I think improve the overall project and reduces some height on the portion of property on Whitaker… All in all, we will be ready to submit our proposal once the RFP is released.”
To which Taschereau replies:
“will ask Rob [Hernandez] if he wants a one on one update from you directly so he is fully informed.”
ON April 6, 2017, Taschereau reaches out to the City’s Sean Brandon for the first time about Starland Village:
“Do you have time to meet tomorrow to review a project – just [for] you to get some ideas and guidance.”
On April 10, 2017, Stringer writes to Taschereau about what is apparently a now-abandoned idea to build a larger parking garage a block from Starland Village:
“After our conversation, I did a ton of thinking on how we might be able to fix the project/neighborhoods current and future parking needs, public transit, etc. that I believe we should all take a hard look at. The city property at 2203 Abercorn st (Cross Street 38th street between Drayton and Abercorn) is actually the same size as the site with the parking structure housing MPC. … Also, it is only 1 block from our project on 38th. Since it is on Abercorn, instead of discussing moving a section of the 14 line of CAT, we could discuss adding a stop at this location. Then, we should look at redeveloping this property as a parking structure with commercial wrap in the form of offices, neighborhood retail, or artist studio spaces, etc. We could turn this into a central transit hub for the entire Starland neighborhood. We could easily create over 200+ parking spaces to sustain current and future projects.” [emphasis ours]
The next day, Stringer emails Brandon:
“I do know that CAT has the 14 line that runs on Abercorn all the way out to Savannah mall across from Armstrong. Although I do want to give Armstrong/Georgia Southern students direct access to our project, it is important that we create public access for those individuals outside of the university system. In addition, I hope that we can also work something out with the downtown loop. I know that it would not only be beneficial to our project but to the neighborhood as a whole. I know public transit is a big topic of conversation with both homeowners and business owners in the neighborhood.”
On April 17, 2017, the bidding opportunity for the police precinct at 2115 Bull St. is officially open for proposals.
ON May 8, 2017, Chatham Area Transit Senior Planner Grant Sparks emails Foram’s Stringer:
“I’ve attached a map and some photos of the bike share siting study that we performed a while back. As you’ll notice, once (sic) of the proposed sites is at 36th & Bull, not far from the new development site… As for the shuttles, I talked to our CEO and our CFO the other day about extending the shuttles south of 37th Street and they’d like to discuss it with our Board. Doing such an extension will be a policy decision [emphasis ours] because it will have an impact on our paratransit revenues and potentially our fixed route ridership (if passengers end up using the new shuttles instead of our regular buses).”
Two days later, Brandon writes Sparks:
“Do you have time to talk with representatives from FORAM (Travis Stringer) and myself about what it would take to move the north/south proposed shuttle further south into the Starland district…?”
ON July 25, 2017, Pam Laws with the City’s Purchasing Dept. emails Travis Stringer and several other recipients that the City has rejected all proposals submitted to purchase the surplus police precinct.
“It is the City’s intent to sell this property to a proposer that maximizes the best use of this property; however, the City has decided to reject all proposals that were submitted in response to this Event. The RFP is being revised to better define the City’s criteria for submitting a response.”
Exactly a month later, Foram and other potential bidders get official notice that the second round of RFPs on the surplus precinct is open.
ON Oct. 17, The Foram Group makes their official proposal at a meeting with Hernandez and others.
By Nov. 6, 2017, Foram is named the winning bidder, and David Keating, City Director of Real Property Services, emails Stringer about formalizing the sale:
“The City Manager has agreed to place this matter on the agenda for Thursday.”
The next day, Alderman Bill Durrence is invited to a “special celebration” of Starland Village set to take place Dec. 1. Mayor DeLoach will get his invitation Nov. 21.
By Nov. 10, 2017, City Council had formally approved the sale of the surplus police precinct to The Foram Group.
NEXT: 2018, zoning battles, and the City Manager’s override.
This article appears in Sep 12-18, 2018.
Two things stand out. One of them is easily missed. The mention of “the creatives” by a developer is in itself something to look closer at. Bull street artists, who tend to see their art as potentially transformative, are wedded to commercial development in this story. It may be time for downtown artists to gather and explore whether or not that is how they see themselves and what kind of Starland they really want.
Ironically all this in contrast to the bashing Foxy Loxy is getting from our city due to a single caller about their acoustic music. The contrast is enormous.
Despite the criticism targeted at city officials and tourism leaders over the years nothing to date has matched the actions of those who seem intent on now playing a south Florida style of commercial development..one that leaves out the human dimension while battering our legacy of historic perservation..a legacy which created the demand in the first place. And that legacy was successfully promoted for many years by Savannah tourism leaders. That is the product that needs protection by our Chamber and Council.
Our present leaders can do better and succeed but they need expert Local help… whether they want it or not. We are all in this thing together. And we means all of us.
Since no one else is commenting on this thorough piece and since our downtown Alderman has been silent, I just want to offer my services in live moderating a frank and civil panel of city and tourism officials, developers, and last but not least, creative types and native Savannah residents,
with the aim of creating a win win for sustainable development. Do I have time? No. But I will make time. I could also easily be talked out of plunging into the heart of a frenzy.
In answer to the comments here by Chase Anderson, I would like to respond as the single caller about their acoustic music. There is quite of bit of misinformation put forth by Foxy in the manner used by Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein – attack the accuser to deflect from the real problem.
First of all, I tried for 8 months to get cooperation from Ms. Jenkins to solve the problem so I could enjoy living in my home – never asking she end the shows and with no intention of harming her business. When I was met with nothing but empty promises and lack of cooperation, after 8 months, I gave up and turned to the city.
I am by a huge measure not the single caller which can be corroborated by the previous President of the Neighborhood Association, city officials, a former manager and even a current staff member who will all affirm that the complaints have been many for several years.
I have been subjected to reading all the lies put forth and suffered the consequences by those lies spawning hateful remarks, threats and vandalism of my property.
Also, there is NEVER an acoustic music show but rather they are blasted by electronic means throughout the neighborhood where neighbors more than block and a half away claim they are very disturbed by the shows. Thats not an acoustic music performance. It appears you have never attended a performance at Foxy and just adhere to Ms Jenkins dishonest version of the whole saga. A responsible commenter would at least be interested in knowing the full story from both sides. Is that too much to ask?
Hi Sarinaya…my understanding is that your case is a now legal matter…
I posted my earlier comments hastily and frankly wish I could have deleted them later since I am not privy to the specifics of Development plans for Bull Street. But thats social media. Once posted its out there.
I only mentioned your isolated issue once to contrast the under enforcement of larger scale violations and the over enforcement of smaller ones. But its not unique to Savannah and has nothing to do with current development of Starland.
I would have been more on point…in responding to a different article about noise to have contrasted the enthusiastic citing of your individual noise issue with the profound under enforcement of that exact same ordinance and group of related noise and tour ordinances in the landmark district. What is needed is a balanced system of compliance across the board, thats all.
But Im confident that city leaders will eventually figure that out and realize the huge revenue streams that are generated through enforcing all noise ordinance violations …particularly vehicular noise and tour noise violations which are rarely if ever enforced.
Im confident that one day it will get sorted out one way or the other.